![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Just three days before Trump was inaugurated in January 2017, BuzzFeed News published what it aid were the “specific, unverified, and potentially unverifiable allegations” of the Steele Dossier. In essence, the Steele Dossier - built by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence agent contracted by a private investigation outfit working on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s campaign - contained allegation of a long-running connection and well-developed, “conspiracy of cooperation” between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence that not only alleged that Donald Trump was, via his campaign, formally colluding with Russian election interference but that also that Trump was compromised by Russian intelligence. Often this determination takes the form of an assessment of a level of confidence in the sources/information rather than a declaration of absolute truth or falsity. That construction, not coincidently I would argue, make it similar to a DEA 6 or FBI 302 form that record raw intelligence (e.g., what sources and witnesses say) used by agents who then synthesize and evaluate the material in light of other evidence and intelligence to make a determination as to the veracity of the sources and information gathered. Compiled in 2016 and consisting of 16 reports totaling 35 pages, the Steele Dossier made no evaluation regarding confidence in the ultimate truth or falsity of its contents. The Steele Dossier itself was a form of raw intelligence not a finished intelligence report. In a 2020 interview with The New York Times, Danchenko argued that his job was only to gather "raw intelligence" and was simply passing it on to Steele, who, in turn, has continued to insist that he still believes Trump colluded with Russia.The 45th US president himself has repeatedly branded the allegations of "collusion with Russia" as nothing but a "witch hunt" and "the Russia hoax".As Jeff Stein writes on his excellent SpyTalk site, the so-called Steele Dossier “is in tatters.”įor clarity, the following comments about the Steele Dossier reflect my personal assessments and opinions. The collusion claims were finally debunked with the release of a report by then-US Special Counsel Robert Mueller in April 2019.Even after the dossier was debunked, both Danchenko and his employer, former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, defended their work. They're being indicted for lying and it's quite possible that this is just a Russian disinformation project, so it's just sort of mind blowing", Ortagus said.Steele Dossier The 35-page Steele Dossier, published a week before Donald Trump's inauguration in January 2017, alleged that Russian intelligence had compromising information on the US president and that the Kremlin and Trump had "extensive" secret back channels.The dossier, although thoroughly discredited almost immediately after being leaked, became part of the Democrats three-year campaign accusing Trump of colluding with Russia. Donald Trump's former State Department spokesperson, Morgan Ortagus, has slammed House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff over his support of the Steele Dossier aimed at discrediting the 45th US president.The ex-State Department spokeswoman was referring to Igor Danchenko, the Russian-born analyst, who is charged with making false statements to the FBI, with the Justice Department saying that he allegedly lied about the source of the information provided to the FBI during the 2016 presidential campaign.Schiff responded by insisting that "whoever lied to the FBI or lied to Christopher Steele should be prosecuted, and they are".This was followed by the 61-year-old saying that he "completely" disagrees with Ortagus' "premise".In a subsequent interview with Fox News, Ortagus mentioned her appearance on "The View", admitting that her hands "were shaking a little because I knew it was just incredibly important in that moment to be able to hold him accountable, not for the Republican Party but for everybody who wants to seek truth and justice"."Well, now what have we learned: people are being indicted who were involved in this dossier. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |